Creative

How to Write Diverse Characters Without Stereotypes (Authenticity Guide)

Create authentic, three-dimensional characters from all backgrounds

By Chandler Supple13 min read
Develop My Character

River's AI helps you develop diverse characters authentically by asking the right questions, identifying potential stereotypes, suggesting research resources, and ensuring your characters are three-dimensional people, not representations.

You're writing your novel. Your main character is great—complex, flawed, compelling. But all your characters look like you, come from your background, share your experiences. Your fictional world is less diverse than your actual neighborhood. You want to change that. You want to write characters from different backgrounds, races, cultures, identities. But you're terrified. What if you get it wrong? What if you accidentally write stereotypes? What if people from that community hate what you wrote? Maybe it's safer to just... not try.

Or maybe you've tried. You wrote a diverse character but readers said it felt stereotypical. Or tokenistic. Or like you'd never actually met someone from that background. You did some googling, you tried your best, but something was missing. And now you're even more scared to try again.

Here's what you need to know: Writing diverse, authentic characters is both allowed and required in modern fiction. You CAN write characters different from yourself—writers have done it since fiction began. But you CAN'T be lazy about it. You can't rely on stereotypes, one Google search, or "I have a friend who..." You need research, sensitivity readers, humility, and commitment to getting it right. Not perfect—that's impossible. But thoughtful, researched, respectful.

This guide will teach you: foundational principles for authentic representation, how to research experiences properly, working with sensitivity readers, avoiding common harmful tropes, writing specific identities thoughtfully, and building three-dimensional characters who happen to have identities different from yours.

Foundational Principles

Character First, Identity Second

Don't start with "I need a Black character" or "I should add a disabled character for diversity."

Start with: "I need a character who [role/personality/function]. This character is Black." Or disabled. Or queer. Or Muslim.

Their identity is part of who they are, not ALL they are. They're a person first—with personality, desires, fears, quirks, goals. Their identity affects their experience and perspective, but doesn't define their entire existence.

Bad: "The gay character" or "The Asian one"
Good: "Marcus, the detective who never sleeps and lives on coffee, who happens to be Black and gay"

Avoid Tokenism

Tokenism = including diverse character just to check a box.

Signs of tokenism:

- Only ONE diverse character in entire cast
- They have no character arc of their own
- They exist to educate white protagonist about their identity
- They're defined entirely by their difference
- They disappear after making their diversity point
- They have no life, goals, or personality beyond their identity

Fix: Multiple characters from marginalized groups. Give them their own goals, arcs, and complexity. They're integral to story throughout, not accessories to protagonist's journey.

Stereotypes Are Lazy Writing

Stereotype = oversimplified, often inaccurate representation based on assumptions rather than real experiences.

Why writers use them: Easier than research. Familiar to readers. "But I've seen this in other books/movies."

Why they're harmful: Perpetuate false beliefs about real people. Reduce complex communities to tropes. Hurt people in those communities who are tired of seeing themselves misrepresented. Lazy storytelling that insults both your subject and your readers.

Fix: Do the actual work. Research real experiences. Create specific individual, not type.

Identity Impacts Experience

The "I don't see race/disability/sexuality" approach denies reality. Being Black, disabled, queer, Muslim, poor—these identities affect how the world treats you, what opportunities you access, what challenges you face, how you move through spaces.

Don't ignore identity's impact. But also don't make it the ONLY thing about your character. Balance acknowledging real-world impact with creating full human being.

You're Allowed But Responsible

Non-marginalized authors CAN write diverse characters. Cross-cultural storytelling enriches literature. Empathy and imagination matter.

But: You're responsible for doing it well. Research is mandatory. Sensitivity readers are not optional. Humility is required. Willingness to get it wrong and learn is essential.

Need help developing diverse characters authentically?

River's AI helps you develop diverse characters by asking the right questions, identifying potential stereotypes, suggesting research resources, and ensuring your characters are three-dimensional people, not representations.

Develop My Character

The Research Process

Step 1: Start With Why

Before research, answer honestly: Why does this character need this specific identity?

Good reasons: Story set in specific community where this identity is natural. Character's particular experience requires this identity to be authentic. You're building realistic, diverse world. Identity impacts their specific arc meaningfully. You're exploring themes requiring this perspective.

Bad reasons: "For diversity points." "To seem progressive." "Marketing said I should." "Seems exotic/interesting." No reason except checking box.

If you don't have good story-based reason: Reconsider.

Step 2: Research Experiences, Not Stereotypes

What to read/watch/listen to:

- Memoirs and personal essays by people from that identity
- Oral histories and interviews
- Fiction by own-voices authors from that community
- Academic work on lived experience
- Community-created resources and blogs
- Historical context of that identity's experience

What NOT to rely on:

- Other fiction (might perpetuate same stereotypes)
- Movies/TV (often stereotypical)
- Your one friend from that identity as sole source
- Wikipedia deep-dives without primary sources
- Tourist-level surface understanding

Step 3: Understand Diversity Within Diversity

There's no monolithic "Black experience" or "disabled experience" or "queer experience."

Experience varies by: Geography, class, generation, immigration status, religion, other intersecting identities, family background, personal history.

Research specific experience: Not "Asian American" but "Second-generation Vietnamese American woman in 1990s California tech industry." Not "disabled" but "Person with cerebral palsy who uses wheelchair, living in small rural town with limited accessibility."

Specificity creates authenticity.

Step 4: Find Multiple Diverse Sources

One memoir doesn't represent all experiences. Read/watch/listen to multiple people from the identity. Different perspectives. People who disagree with each other. Current voices, not just historical. Range of experiences within community.

Diversity of sources leads to nuanced, three-dimensional character.

Working With Sensitivity Readers

What Is a Sensitivity Reader?

Beta reader from the identity you're writing who reads specifically for: stereotypes, inaccuracies, harmful tropes you might not see, missed opportunities for authenticity, potential impact on real community.

When to Hire

AFTER draft is complete. Not during planning stage (that's research time). Not asking permission to write character (that's your choice). For feedback on execution.

Use sensitivity readers when writing significantly outside your identity, especially for marginalized identities facing active discrimination.

How to Work With Them

DO:

- Pay them fairly ($50-200 depending on length and depth)
- Ask specific questions about your character/story
- Listen to their feedback with openness
- Thank them for their time and expertise
- Understand they're individuals, not spokespersons for entire community

DON'T:

- Argue with their feedback defensively
- Ask them to approve or give permission
- Expect them to fix your book for you
- Ask for free labor ("great exposure though!")
- Get offended when they point out problems

What Sensitivity Readers Are NOT

They're NOT: Giving you permission to write this identity. Proof you can't be criticized by other readers. Guarantee of perfect representation. The final word on all experiences.

They're one valuable perspective. If they identify problems, take it seriously. But one sensitivity reader's approval doesn't immunize you against criticism from others in that community.

Common Harmful Pitfalls to Avoid

The Magical Minority

What it is: Diverse character exists solely to help white/privileged protagonist grow. Has no agency of their own. Often mystical, wise, or saintly. Sacrifices themselves for protagonist.

Examples: Magical Negro trope, Manic Pixie Dream Girl who's also woman of color, Wise Native American elder, Sassy Black best friend with no life of her own.

Fix: Give them their own arc, goals, and life separate from protagonist. They're not here to teach lessons or facilitate someone else's growth.

Trauma Porn

What it is: Diverse character's story is ONLY suffering. Endless discrimination scenes. No joy, normalcy, or hope. Their identity equals constant pain for reader consumption.

Fix: Balance struggle with joy. Show resilience, community, strength, regular human moments. Their life isn't only about oppression even though oppression is real.

The Exotic Other

What it is: Character's culture described as mysterious, sensual, foreign. Described through white gaze. Exoticized for titillation.

Examples: "Almond-shaped eyes." "Mysterious accent." "Exotic beauty." Cultural practices described as strange or primitive.

Fix: Describe from character's own perspective. What's normal to them. Respect, not fetishize. Never describe skin tones as food.

The Single Story

What it is: All characters from one identity are the same. All Black characters from "the hood." All Asian characters good at math. All disabled characters inspiring. Monolithic representation.

Fix: Variety within your diverse characters. Different backgrounds, personalities, socioeconomic status, experiences. No community is monolithic.

Writing Specific Identities

Race and Ethnicity

Research priorities: Specific culture (not monolithic racial category), immigration history if applicable, code-switching (how language/behavior changes by context), family dynamics and cultural values, experiences with racism (systemic and interpersonal), cultural practices with meaning and context.

Avoid: Describing skin as food ("mocha," "caramel," "chocolate"), only mentioning race when character isn't white, having POC constantly discuss race with white characters, treating cultural practices as exotic spectacle.

Disability

Research priorities: Specific disability's actual impact, day-to-day lived experience, adaptive strategies and assistive technology, medical vs. social model of disability, community language preferences, accessibility barriers.

Avoid: Inspiration porn (disabled person exists to inspire able-bodied people), magical cure narrative, disability as punishment or metaphor for evil, "overcoming" language (they live with disability, not defeat it), forgetting about disability after introducing it.

LGBTQ+ Identities

Research priorities: Specific identity (bi experience ≠ lesbian experience ≠ trans experience), coming out experiences (varied, not universal), historical context for your setting's time period, found family and community importance, intersectionality with other identities.

Avoid: "Bury your gays" trope (killing queer characters disproportionately), tragic queer narrative as only option, coming out as character's only plot, token gay best friend with no life, treating identity as twist/reveal.

Religion

Research priorities: Specific practice within religion (not all Muslims practice identically), daily observances and rituals, how it shapes worldview and decisions, relationship with religious community, intersection with cultural identity.

Avoid: All religious people as either naive or oppressive, monolithic representation of diverse faith traditions, religion as shorthand for backwards/evil, conversion as growth arc.

Socioeconomic Class

Research priorities: Specific financial realities and constraints, access to resources and opportunities, cultural capital and education access, how class shapes life choices, dignity in poverty.

Avoid: Poverty porn (exploiting suffering), poor people as inherently noble/pure, wealth as automatic moral failing, easy upward mobility narratives, class differences played for comedy.

Building Three-Dimensional Characters

Four Essential Components

1. External identity: What's visible to others—physical appearance, cultural practices, how they present to world.

2. Internal experience: How identity feels to them—pride, ambivalence, conflict? When they code-switch and why. What they hide or reveal.

3. External impact: How world treats them—microaggressions they face, systemic barriers, assumptions people make, opportunities denied or granted.

4. Individual personality: Who they are beyond identity—quirks, hobbies, pet peeves, sense of humor, specific strengths and flaws, dreams unrelated to identity.

All four components together = fully realized, authentic character.

Showing Identity, Not Just Stating It

Don't just say "Marcus was Black and gay."

Show through: How others react to them. Cultural references they naturally make. Code-switching behavior. Specific experiences that reveal identity. Their particular perspective on events.

In first-person POV, character knows their own identity and might mention it in context when relevant, but probably won't announce it to themselves.

When You Get It Wrong

Receiving Criticism

When readers from the identity give feedback saying you got something wrong:

Listen. Even if it's hard. Even if other readers loved it. Even if you researched extensively. They're telling you their experience reading your work.

Don't: Get defensive, explain what you meant, cite your research, point to sensitivity reader approval, dismiss as "just one person's opinion."

Evaluate: One reader doesn't represent all readers from that identity. But patterns matter. Multiple people saying same thing = listen carefully.

Decide: You choose whether to change it. But understand potential impact of not changing.

When You Cause Harm

Acknowledge: "I aimed for authentic representation but missed the mark here."

Apologize: "I'm sorry for the harm this caused to [community]."

Learn: "I'm listening to feedback and will do better in future work."

Act: Update future editions if possible. Apply lessons to next book. Actually do better.

Don't: Blame sensitivity readers for not catching it, say intention matters more than impact, expect praise for apologizing, center your hurt feelings over harm caused.

Your Character Development Action Plan

Before Writing: - [ ] Identify why this character needs this specific identity (story reason, not box-checking) - [ ] Research memoirs, personal essays, and oral histories from that identity - [ ] Find multiple diverse sources within that community - [ ] Study historical and cultural context - [ ] List common stereotypes to actively avoid - [ ] Develop character's personality beyond their identity During Writing: - [ ] Treat character as individual, not representative - [ ] Give them goals, fears, and quirks unrelated to identity - [ ] Show how identity impacts their experience realistically - [ ] Include joy and normalcy, not only struggle - [ ] Avoid having them educate other characters constantly - [ ] Let them be flawed and complex After Drafting: - [ ] Hire sensitivity reader from that identity - [ ] Pay them fairly for their expertise and time - [ ] Ask specific questions about potential issues - [ ] Listen to feedback with openness, not defensiveness - [ ] Revise based on valid concerns - [ ] Understand you might still receive criticism After Publishing: - [ ] Listen to feedback from readers in that community - [ ] Acknowledge mistakes if you make them - [ ] Learn and apply lessons to next book - [ ] Continue researching and growing - [ ] Support own-voices authors from communities you write

Final Thoughts: Fear and Responsibility

Fear of getting it wrong is valid. But fear isn't excuse for not trying or for not doing the work. The solution to fear isn't avoiding diverse characters—it's approaching them with research, humility, and care.

Your fictional worlds should reflect real-world diversity. Homogeneous casts are unrealistic and limiting. But authentic diversity requires effort. You can't be lazy. You can't rely on stereotypes or surface research. You have to actually care about getting it right—not perfect, but thoughtful and researched.

Impact matters more than intention. "I meant well" doesn't erase harm if you perpetuate stereotypes or write tokenistic characters. You're responsible for what you put into the world, regardless of intention. Sensitivity readers help but don't immunize you against criticism. Getting it wrong is part of the process—commitment to learning from mistakes is what matters.

Remember: You're writing people. Complex, flawed, three-dimensional human beings who happen to have identities different from yours. Not representatives. Not educational tools. Not diversity checkboxes. People.

Treat them as individuals with their own goals, personalities, histories, and humanity. Research their specific lived experiences. Understand how identity shapes their perspective without defining their entire existence. Give them the same depth and care you give characters who share your identity.

You can do this. But you must do the work. Research thoroughly. Hire sensitivity readers. Listen to criticism. Learn from mistakes. Keep improving. That's how you write diverse characters who feel authentic—not perfect representations, but real people navigating their specific experiences with complexity and humanity.

The effort is worth it. For your story. For your craft. And for the real people in communities you're representing who deserve to see themselves portrayed with care, nuance, and respect.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need a sensitivity reader if I researched extensively and feel confident about my representation?

Yes. Research gives you knowledge but not lived experience. Sensitivity readers catch things you can't see because you don't live that identity. They identify stereotypes you didn't know were stereotypes, inaccuracies your sources missed, and nuances you couldn't learn from books. Think of it like hiring editor even though you learned grammar—fresh expert eyes catch what you miss. Cost ($50-200) is investment in not harming real community and not getting publicly criticized for easily fixable problems. Even authors from the identity often use sensitivity readers for other aspects of character (disabled Black author might need sensitivity reader for Jewish aspects of character, etc.). Confidence without lived experience = highest risk for problems.

What if I get contradictory feedback from two different sensitivity readers from the same community?

This is normal and actually proves important point: No monolithic experience. People from same identity disagree about representation. STRATEGY: (1) Look for what they agree on—that's likely most important, (2) Understand where disagreement comes from (different experiences within community? different values? different reading preferences?), (3) Make informed choice based on your story needs and which feedback resonates, (4) Understand that whatever you choose, some readers from community will disagree—that's inevitable. One sensitivity reader doesn't give you "approval" that protects from all criticism. Goal isn't pleasing everyone (impossible) but creating thoughtful, researched representation that shows you did the work even if some readers wish you'd made different choices.

Can I write a villain from a marginalized identity, or will that be seen as problematic?

You CAN write villains from marginalized identities, but requires care. PROBLEMS arise when: (1) Only diverse character is villain (implies identity = evil), (2) Their identity is WHY they're villain (evil because gay, etc.), (3) They represent negative stereotypes about their community, (4) No positive representation of that identity elsewhere in book. SOLUTIONS: (1) Include other characters from that identity who aren't villains, (2) Make sure their villainy is about personality/choices, not identity, (3) Avoid making them stereotype of that community, (4) Let them be complex villain with understandable motivations, not caricature. Diverse characters should be heroes, villains, side characters, everything—just like majority characters. The problem isn't diverse villain existing; it's when that's ONLY representation.

I'm writing historical fiction set in a time/place where certain identities faced extreme discrimination. How do I show historical reality without being exploitative or traumatizing readers?

BALANCE historical accuracy with respect for modern readers. STRATEGIES: (1) Acknowledge reality without wallowing in suffering porn—readers know racism/homophobia/etc. existed, don't need graphic scenes to prove it, (2) Show characters' resistance and resilience, not just victimization, (3) Include moments of joy, community, and humanity even in oppressive times, (4) Consider content warnings for graphic violence/slurs, (5) Ask: Is this scene necessary to story, or am I including it to show "how bad it was"? (6) Center diverse character's perspective and experience, not oppressor's learning curve. AVOID: Using historical accuracy as excuse to use slurs gratuitously, making entire story about oppression with no character agency, having modern attitudes without acknowledging you're deviating from historical norm, treating historical bigotry as shocking reveal (readers know). Research how people from that identity actually lived in that time—not just how they were oppressed.

What if I'm from a marginalized identity but want to write characters from a different marginalized identity I don't belong to? Do I still need sensitivity readers?

Yes. Being marginalized doesn't give expertise in all marginalization. Black author writing disabled character needs disability sensitivity reader. Queer author writing Muslim character needs Muslim sensitivity reader. Being oppressed in one way doesn't teach you about all oppression. Different forms of marginalization have different histories, stereotypes, experiences, and community concerns. ADVANTAGE you have: Understanding what it's like to be misrepresented, importance of research, and how harmful stereotypes feel. Use that empathy and care when writing other marginalized identities. But still do the research and hire appropriate sensitivity readers. Your lived experience in one identity doesn't substitute for research in another.

Is it better to just avoid writing diverse characters if I'm afraid of getting it wrong and causing harm?

NO. Avoiding diversity because of fear is choosing harm through erasure instead of risking harm through mistakes. Homogeneous casts in your fiction say "these stories are only for people like me" and deny that your diverse readers exist. BETTER: Feel the fear and do the work anyway. Research. Hire sensitivity readers. Listen to feedback. Learn from mistakes. Improve continuously. Your discomfort navigating diversity is infinitely less important than diverse people's right to see themselves in stories. Fear of making mistakes is understandable but not excuse for exclusion. Growth requires risk. If you make mistake, acknowledge it, learn, do better next time. Authors who do the work—even imperfectly—are better than authors who avoid it entirely. Start with research and care, accept you'll stumble sometimes, commit to learning. That's how you grow as writer and create more inclusive stories.

Chandler Supple

Co-Founder & CTO at River

Chandler spent years building machine learning systems before realizing the tools he wanted as a writer didn't exist. He founded River to close that gap. In his free time, Chandler loves to read American literature, including Steinbeck and Faulkner.

About River

River is an AI-powered document editor built for professionals who need to write better, faster. From business plans to blog posts, River's AI adapts to your voice and helps you create polished content without the blank page anxiety.