Generate complete review of systems (ROS)
AI creates a comprehensive 14-system review of systems with customizable positive and negative findings.
Generate complete review of systems (ROS)
River's ROS Generator creates complete 14-system review of systems documentation for medical records. You specify any positive findings and the AI generates comprehensive ROS covering Constitutional, Eyes, ENT, Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Gastrointestinal, Genitourinary, Musculoskeletal, Skin, Neurological, Psychiatric, Endocrine, Hematologic/Lymphatic, and Allergic/Immunologic systems. The ROS includes appropriate negatives and proper formatting. Perfect for physicians, residents, and medical students needing complete systems review documentation quickly.
Unlike incomplete or missing ROS documentation, this tool ensures all systems are addressed systematically. Complete ROS demonstrates thoroughness, identifies symptoms patient might not mention spontaneously, and supports billing levels for comprehensive exams. The AI formats ROS professionally with pertinent positives highlighted and systematic negatives documented. When ROS is complete, it provides comprehensive symptom screening and meets documentation requirements.
This tool is perfect for medical students learning systematic review, residents documenting efficiently, attending physicians ensuring complete notes, or any clinician needing ROS documentation. If your ROS is incomplete or takes too long, this creates comprehensive systems review instantly. Use it for any encounter requiring complete or comprehensive exam documentation.
Why Complete ROS Matters
Review of systems serves multiple purposes: identifies symptoms patient didn't mention in chief complaint, screens for related conditions, provides comprehensive baseline, and supports billing for detailed or comprehensive exams. Complete ROS requires reviewing 10 or more systems. For billing purposes, comprehensive exam needs complete ROS. Even when you don't ask every question verbally, documenting systematic review shows thoroughness. Positive findings warrant further exploration. Negative findings reassure about differential considerations.
Efficient ROS documentation involves understanding what to document. For focused visits, brief ROS covering problem-related systems may suffice. For comprehensive exams or complex cases, complete 14-system review is appropriate. Many EHRs have ROS templates with checkboxes. Whether using template or free text, document pertinent positives specifically and note negative findings systematically. Statement like 'all other systems reviewed and negative' after detailing positive findings is acceptable and efficient.
ROS differs from physical exam. ROS documents symptoms patient reports (subjective). Physical exam documents what you observe or measure (objective). Keep these sections separate in your documentation. ROS helps you decide what physical exam elements to focus on. Complete ROS improves diagnostic accuracy by ensuring you don't miss important symptoms and supports appropriate billing level by demonstrating comprehensive assessment.
What You Get
Complete 14-system review of systems
All organ systems covered systematically
Customizable positive findings
Appropriate negative findings documented
Professional formatting ready for medical record
Meets comprehensive exam documentation requirements
How It Works
- 1Specify positive findingsTell AI about any positive symptoms by system
- 2AI generates ROSCreates complete 14-system review in 1-2 minutes
- 3Review and adjustVerify accuracy, add any additional findings
- 4Paste into noteCopy complete ROS into subjective section
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I really need to review all 14 systems for every patient?
Depends on visit type and billing level. For problem-focused visits, brief ROS of affected system and related systems suffices. For comprehensive exams (new patients, annual physicals, complex cases), complete ROS supports appropriate documentation and billing. Many physicians use templates with all systems listed and quickly mark positives, noting all others negative. This takes minimal time and ensures completeness.
What if I didn't actually ask patient about every system?
Document what you actually reviewed. Many physicians review systems most relevant to chief complaint verbally, then scan through others looking for obvious issues. You can document 'pertinent systems reviewed' for focused exams. For comprehensive exams where complete ROS is needed, ensure you've appropriately screened all major systems even if briefly. Don't document reviews you didn't perform, but systematic screening is appropriate and efficient.
How specific should positive findings be?
Be specific. Instead of 'positive cardiovascular,' document 'reports occasional palpitations, denies chest pain, shortness of breath, orthopnea, PND, or edema.' Specific positive findings matter clinically and for documentation. Generic positives don't help with diagnosis or meet documentation standards. Include pertinent negatives that help narrow differential.
Can I use 'all other systems negative' as a catch-all?
Yes, after documenting specific positive findings. Example: 'Constitutional: denies fever, chills, weight changes. Respiratory: reports cough as per HPI. Cardiovascular: denies chest pain, palpitations. [Continue with systems relevant to visit]. All other systems reviewed and negative.' This is efficient and acceptable. Just ensure you've actually reviewed systems and aren't missing important symptoms.
What is River?
River is an AI-powered document editor that helps you write better, faster. With intelligent writing assistance, real-time collaboration, and powerful AI tools, River transforms how professionals create content.
AI-Powered Writing
Get intelligent suggestions and assistance as you write.
Professional Tools
Access specialized tools for any writing task.
Privacy-First
Your documents stay private and secure.
Ready to try Generate complete review of systems (ROS)?
Start using this tool in 60 seconds. No credit card required.
Create ROS →